A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. Expands to Massachusetts with New Back Bay Boston Office

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok

BOSTON, Mass. — The Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C., a nationally recognized plaintiffs’ litigation firm, is proud to announce the opening of its new Back Bay Boston office, expanding the firm’s ability to represent employees and consumers throughout Massachusetts.

The expansion reflects the firm’s continued growth and its commitment to providing exceptional plaintiff-side representation in jurisdictions with some of the nation’s strongest employee and consumer protection laws. The Boston office will be led by Partner Meghan George,  who is licensed in both Massachusetts and California and will oversee the firm’s Massachusetts litigation practice.

“For decades, our firm has been committed to standing up for individuals whose rights have been violated,” said Todd M. Friedman, Founder and Managing Partner of the Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. “Massachusetts has long been a leader in protecting employees and consumers, making Boston a natural next step in our firm’s continued growth. We are excited to bring our experience, resources, and client-centered approach to individuals and businesses throughout the Commonwealth.”

The Boston office will focus on representing employees in all aspects of employment/workplace litigation, including claims involving discrimination, harassment, retaliation, whistleblower protections, wrongful termination, disability accommodations, pregnancy discrimination, religious accommodations, family and medical leave, wage and hour violations, employee misclassification, equal pay violations, unpaid wages and overtime, executive compensation disputes, employment agreements, and other violations of state and federal employment laws.

The firm will also represent consumers and businesses in a wide range of civil litigation matters, including claims arising under the Massachusetts Consumer Protection Act (Chapter 93A), automobile Lemon Law cases, warranty disputes, Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act claims, insurance bad faith, unfair claim settlement practices, automobile fraud, deceptive business practices, breach of contract, and other consumer protection matters.

A central focus of the firm’s Massachusetts practice will be litigation under Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 93A, one of the nation’s most comprehensive consumer protection statutes. The firm also intends to build a leading Massachusetts Lemon Law practice by representing consumers facing persistent vehicle defects, warranty violations, and manufacturer misconduct.

“Our firm has built its reputation by aggressively advocating for individuals against employers, manufacturers, insurance companies, and other large corporations,” Friedman said. “Opening our Boston office allows us to extend that same commitment to clients throughout Massachusetts while continuing to grow our national plaintiffs’ practice.”

Located in the heart of Boston’s Back Bay, the new office will serve clients throughout Massachusetts while working seamlessly with the firm’s existing offices and attorneys across the country.

About the Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C.

The Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. is a plaintiff-side litigation firm representing employees, consumers, and businesses in complex civil litigation. The firm’s practice includes employment law, wage and hour litigation, consumer protection, Chapter 93A claims, Lemon Law, warranty litigation, insurance disputes, class actions, and other plaintiff-side civil matters. The firm is committed to protecting the rights of individuals and holding employers, corporations, insurers, manufacturers, and other wrongdoers accountable.

Quick Navigation

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.